EZCA 3 for P3D4.5 HOT FIX 3 here.

thanks

C

I applied Hotfix 3 and installed 3.0.1.84 and ActiveSky P4 7410.

I found a massive shift in the eye position so all my camera sets were useless. fortunately I had kept Hotfix 2 client so was able to roll back. Once I did everything was OK again. 

I wonder if anyone else had this and if so is there an easy fix. 

I ran EZDOK config as usual but it didn't resolve the issue.

Also looking forward to testing the V5 version.

Thanks, Chris

 

Hi!

We are already running closed beta tests of EZCA3.1 in P3D v5 with ActiveSkyP3D new beta. We'll do an open test in a couple of days.

BUT! Support for the new ASP3D is planned only for Prepar5!

EZCA3.0 for P3D v4 will only remain compatible with the official version of ActiveSkyP4 7410.

I had problems with the cockpit camera when pressing middle mouse button for panning camera.

After installing .84 with AS fix I think it was solved.

Today I installed the new beta for ASP3D (that is also valid for v5) and I have again problems with panning.

Anyone else?

Thanks very much.

Edit: Closed AS and camera works smooth so this must be the problem again. Will you release a new build compatible with new ASP3D version?

This is a pity as I believe that the new ASP3D will also introduce some nice new benefits into P3D v4.5.  Is there no way we will be able to use your fantastic EZCA3 in P3D v4.5 and get the full effects of the new ASP3D?

If any of the versions of ActiveSky EZCA does not have a direct connection, this does not mean that ActiveSky will not be able to work. ActiveSky works fine in any case.

Of course, when EZCA has a direct connect with Activesky - it allows to accurately simulate the turbulence in the place where the plane is, but even if no direct connection with the AS, EZCA work out the effects of turbulence based on METAR received from the simulator (this allows to simulate turbulence with any other weather engines, except ActiveSky).

Therefore, in any case, any version of the ActiveSky will still work correctly if the XTM module is enabled.

But of course direct communication with ActiveSky is the maximum realism and we will always try to support this possibility.

In any case, what we are talking about is the reaction of the aircraft to the weather, the "other" camera control program does not have at all, so this comparison can be finished.