![]() |
Active Topics Memberlist Search |
| |
| Ground Environment X Series | |
| Topic: NickN - 3Ware Raid0 Integration Advise? | |
| Author | Message |
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Topic: NickN - 3Ware Raid0 Integration Advise?Posted: 29 October 2008 at 11:46am |
|
Hi Nick, I thought I might try and find you in this forum first, so forgive me for the off-topic thread. I've decided to go back to a raid0 setup with my two Raptors (150GB ea) and have decided to follow some of your advise regarding a dedicated hardware raid controller. I just purchased a 3ware 9650SE-4LPML PCI Express from NewEgg here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816116042. I few quick questions if you don't mind. First, I have one of my raptors on C: as the Win x64 OS drive, and the other raptor dedicated to FSXsp2 on the D:. I also have a Caviar for archives on the E: drive. I'd like to just update my O&O backup images of C & D drives to my E (archive drive), and restore these two drives as paritions on the raid0, thereby keeping all the registry entries intact without having to re-install everything. Regards, E8500 OC=4.0GHz |
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 29 October 2008 at 12:22pm |
|
1. 250K Stripe on the FSX array 2. You must enable WRITE CACHE and use these settings for perf SEE UPDATE BELOW FOR READ CACHE SETTING
3. With Write Cache enabled which is required for perf, be aware without the 3ware battery backup unit for the card you CAN lose the array in the event of a power failure or crash and the card has data in the memory of the card in transit to the drive.. you can also end up with corrupted data and the array still function. If you do not have the 3ware BBU for the card I would not put any drive on that card which has mission critical data and no OS drive. Placing FSX on the array alone would only be susceptible to loss in power failures and crashes if it is in a WRITE operation at the time of the crash (installing addons or a service pack) Otherwise simply reading from the drive it wont hurt anything should such failures occur. However, you should have that BBU from 3ware to ensure complete safe operation and at that point you can place any drive on the controller with confidence. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816116051 That controller will allow single drives to perform much better as well as multi I/O arrays. 4. Make SURE you update BOTH the cards firmware and drivers using the latest release from 3Ware. I believe the latest codeset is 9.5.1 as I recall and make sure file and print sharing are enabled in Windows and enabled in the firewall which is required for communication with the card at Windows boot. 5. The card is designed for 3GB/s from each port connector. The 150 Raptors are 1.5GB/s units. The new Vrap is 3. One advantage to that card is if you were to take 2 cheaper 3GB/s Seagate drives with the 32mb cache, they would exceed the 1st gen Raptor for performance but only in RAID0 configuration. 6. DO NOT partition a RAID array, ever. Create the array and install FSX to it and if this is some kind of backup and the target array it not the same drive letter at the original install there will be problems you can not solve without a complete reinstall of FSX and addons. Make sure the target array for FSX and the Windows drive end up with the same drive letters they are on now.
NOTE: NEW SETTING FOR UPDATE 9.5.2
NEW SETTING IN THE CONTROLLER
PLEASE MAKE SURE READ CACHE IS SET TO BASIC DISABLED or INTELLIGENT is SLOWER
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 29 October 2008 at 12:33pm |
|
7. On the FSX array, before installing anything it must be formatted... I highly reccommend a 3rd party disk software such as Acronis Disk Director to change the cluster size on the array to 64K in the format process and format it as a LOGICAL drive That cluster change will greatly reduce maintenance time and the drive will not fragment any where near as quickly keeping your FSX install clean longer. It will also assist in increasing perf by reducing the number of clusters per sector.
A Windows boot drive or any drive which holds a Windows page file CAN NOT BE any cluster size other than 4k
8. After restoring the data to the array (or any other drive you use that method) you MUST repeat the O&O defrag process from the beginning of the list on the FSX array. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 29 October 2008 at 2:29pm |
|
Very very good info Nick. Thank you so much for sharing your wealth of knowledge. I hope to perform this upgrade this weekend and will let you know how it goes. Thanks again...
|
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 30 October 2008 at 9:54am |
|
Nick, as I read throught the docs this morning a few questions come to mind in anticipation of my card arriving tomorrow. First, I did purchase the BBU backup last night but I can not tell if it comes with the expansion bracket that actually holds the battery, do you know if does? Also, when you say not to partition arrays, how about creating mulitvolumes during the creation of the array and then using two volumes as C: & D: drives; any performance decrease using this method? As for my third E: (Archive) drive, it is currently installed on the ICH9R southridge as an AHCI drive. I do not intend to reformat this drive as it will have all my custom files backup on it to transfer to the new "Raptor array." My thinking is, if I could get this standalone drive onto the 9650 controller without reformatting, I could then disable the ICH9R controller in the BIOS and not load the Intel driver or monitoring software, thereby saving on background processes and more I/O running. Thoughts? Thanks again, |
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 30 October 2008 at 10:56am |
|
I already had a remote mount from another card I used.. to tell you the truth I dont remember right off hand what came in the kit but I do think it has a plate it sits on. I would have to dig in my parts box to see what came with the BBU originally. I know 3ware sells a separate remote mount but as I said I already had one so I simply clipped the battery into it. The battey does get warm so if space is tight remote mounting even a few inches is a nice thing to have. You could probably get something at Radio Shack that would do the job.. they did at one time sell universal clips for flat batteies but I have not been to a Shack in a while.
Multivolumes? On the array itself? Thats partitioning.. no, the array is the array. Its for FSX only and I also use mine as a scratch drive for video editing and photoshop. The free space left over is great for such things. The card supports 4 SATA II plugs... you can make any combination of drive setups you like.., single drive with a 2 drive array, 3 drive array or all single. If you intend to boot from the card and not use any onboard controller you will need to configure the boot drive on the card as a single drive and bootable then set the BIOS of the computer to boot the 3ware controller as the boot hard drive. The card should then do the rest. If you move all your drives to the 3ware controller then you can shut down the ICH9R controller in the BIOS and it will no longer appear in Windows. Single drives should not require data destruction however you will get a warning if that may happen or you ake a mistake in settings so just watch the screen and dont click OK if you are not sure. A RAID array will require data destruction..
You know.. the best thing to do when you are learning something like this is work one drive at a time and then build the array last. Dont slam things and move them in an ordered sequence to learn how to set up the drives and card..
EDIT: The only problem you may end up with here is a configuration issue with drive letters.. how the BIOS sees the drives and how Windows sees the drives will be 2 different things.. in that, you may have issues because the boot.ini file is no longer correct for the location of Windows even if the drive letter is the same... hmmmmmm yea, I can a problem there. You may have to do a boot repair using the Windows install disk and the 3ware drivers on a floppy and access the RECOVERY CONSOLE to correct and rewrite the boot.ini file and repair the Windows boot that way.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291980
Swapping boot drives is always a pain in the arse when going from a MB to card controller
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 02 November 2008 at 5:25pm |
|
Hi Nick, I just thought I would drop in with a progress report. The 3ware card arrived Friday afternoon and I spent the rest of the evening trying to get the machine to boot with the card in the lower (second blue) PCIe slot in my Asus P5E3-Deluxe board as it was the first available. I finally found an obscure post on some forum with the solution which was to put the GPU in the second slot (still an x16 slot) and the 3Ware card in the first PCIe-1 (upper x16 blue) slot. The drawback being that I had to completely remount all my drives to the upper bays as the friggin 9800GTX was too long with the drives installed in the lower bays, right where the lower PICe slot was. This was the only way I could get the machine to even think about posting. Some previously known descrepency between the two boards that took about an hour to find using Google. Anyway, I decided that since this is a dedicated FSXsp2 box and nothing else, I would make the raid0 the primary C: drive with both Raptors and have it contain both the system and FSXsp2 files. So, I left the default cluster size at 4096 and managed to carve the 256-bit stripe as well as the latest drivers and firmware. Now some 20 hours of integration later (shot the heck out of this weekend), and I'm done installing all the software as well as your tweaks from the simviation forum. I am now on my first of the two Complete\Name defrags and then it's time Image the array to my "Archive" E: drive as a backup before evening the is out. Thank God for football while installing software, defrags, and disk image. What a perfrect time of year to perform such tasks, huh, LOL... Since the wife has been nagging me for Christmas ideas, I think I'll ask for a pair of VelociRaptors to go with the card while we wait for the Spring sales on the new i7 hardware. Just wanted to say, "Thanks again" for your advise. Keep up the great support as there are many of us who have learned a lot. Regards, |
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 02 November 2008 at 6:18pm |
|
I was not aware of the restriction to the 1st slot for card boot on the P5E3. I will check into that though. Sorry it was such a hassle I am really not sure how that may play out with everything on the array. I have always been one to put the OS on one drive and FSX on its own. None then less the controller with the drive will be much more efficient and perform much better than the motherboard ports, thats for sure.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
epos
New Member
Joined: 05 November 2008 Posts: 2 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 9:45am |
|
Hi Nick,
I have a 3ware 9650SE-4L with 2 WD Raptor 150Gb configured in Raid 0 following your settings. One of the 2 Raptors broke and I decided to change both with 2 Velociraptor that I set up exactly as per your instructions, also updating both firmware and hardware of the Raid card. I thought that I would have had at least better loading time for FSX and the flights, but instead I had no improvement at all, loading time are exactly the same as before. Thanks for any suggestion you can give me E8500 @3,8 GHz - XP 32 SP3 - 4 GB Ram - asus striker extreme - asus 8800 ultra |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 10:43am |
|
Past a certain storage speed point FSX flight loading time is not based on the drives.. its based on the CPU, memory and video card which is why myths get perpetuated about how the faster drives wont make any difference. You are seeing the limits of your components other than the storage array in FSX loading time however be rest assured you are not limited or suffering in scenery and texture loads which is what it important.
There is such a thing as "Maxed Out" for storage performance on todays rendering hardware and with 2 Vraps in RAID (on that professional 3ware card) you are there and then some. You have reached the performance level of SAS (SCSI) with that array. The array on that card will deliver the data at a speed which is equal to or faster than the limits of the system which can process it.. until such time as nex gen motherboard. CPU/memory and video adapters come along at which point your storage system is ready for them and will not pose any bottleneck
By the way.. just an FYI: a single Vraptor on that card in SATAII single drive mode will just about beat 2 1st generation Raptors in RAID0
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
epos
New Member
Joined: 05 November 2008 Posts: 2 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 10:56am |
|
Ok that's very clear, thank's for your answer!
|
|
|
E8500 @ 3,8GHz - xp32 sp3 - 4GB ram - asus striker extreme - asus 8800 ultra
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Psybear
Senior Member
Joined: 02 April 2008 Posts: 154 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 7:27pm |
|
Hi Nick,
I'm trying not to bug you too much as you are full bore on GEX EU. But 3ware is not answering my question and you seem to be up to speed on their card. Do you happen to know if it (the 9650SE) will work with an EVGA 780i mobo? Salud |
|
|
FSX Accel(MTX/STB/FSG/STLC/GEX/UTX/FEX-ASA) Vrap300 | Win7 x64 Vrap150 | SATAII 9650SE 4L
780i/Q9650@3.6GHz|4GB DDR2 @ 1066MHz 5-4-4-10-2T GTX275 @ 648-2376-1458|24W @ 19x12 + 19"|X-Fi Prelude |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 8:03pm |
|
I can't answer that. It would be a question for 3ware to answer.
They have a motherboard list for the cards at the website. The motherboards I use are not listed on their list but the card works fine none the less |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Psybear
Senior Member
Joined: 02 April 2008 Posts: 154 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 8:20pm |
|
Yeah. Already checked there first. It's a very, very, very limited list.
I'm pretty sure it will work.., though a bit concerned at 3wares lack of response to a simple straightforward question. (2 weeks now) I'll figure it out. Thanks for the quick response. If anyone is running the card on a 780i please let me know. Thanks. |
|
|
FSX Accel(MTX/STB/FSG/STLC/GEX/UTX/FEX-ASA) Vrap300 | Win7 x64 Vrap150 | SATAII 9650SE 4L
780i/Q9650@3.6GHz|4GB DDR2 @ 1066MHz 5-4-4-10-2T GTX275 @ 648-2376-1458|24W @ 19x12 + 19"|X-Fi Prelude |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 05 November 2008 at 10:09pm |
|
I do not use Nvidia motherboards so I have no frame of reference to even guess if the card will work or not. I only use P35, x38, x48 and x58 chipset boards in which the card works in all of them
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
truck911
Senior Member
Joined: 24 October 2008 Posts: 155 |
![]() Posted: 25 December 2008 at 7:29am |
|
Originally posted by NickN
I was not aware of the restriction to the 1st slot for card boot on the P5E3. I will check into that though. Sorry it was such a hassle I am really not sure how that may play out with everything on the array. I have always been one to put the OS on one drive and FSX on its own. None then less the controller with the drive will be much more efficient and perform much better than the motherboard ports, thats for sure.
Merry Christmas Nick. For clarity as I have just ordered XPP x64 OS (hard to find these days) should be here in days and I will be doing the whole re-install thing. I have FSX on a dedicated array. FSX is the only thing on that array. For my OS drive do I want to partition it to save reformatting time? I would put the OS on say a 30gb partition and other programs on the remainder. My primary interest is FSX performance so if a single partition is preferable I am ok with it. All that a separate OS partition would be saving me is the time of reinstalling the OS which I have seemed to be averaging once per month for various reasons. Not sure what to do here what’s best?
|
|
|
Regards,
Gary |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 25 December 2008 at 8:43pm |
|
You can partition the OS drive and use it that way IF you follow these rules: 1. The OS is located on the FIRST physical partition of the drive 2. The OS and installed programs partition has after all programs are installed at LEAST 40-50% freespace remaining
I would not run FSX on the OS drive and always install it to its own drive or array
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
truck911
Senior Member
Joined: 24 October 2008 Posts: 155 |
![]() Posted: 25 December 2008 at 9:08pm |
|
Originally posted by NickN
You can partition the OS drive and use it that way IF you follow these rules: 1. The OS is located on the FIRST physical partition of the drive 2. The OS and installed programs partition has after all programs are installed at LEAST 40-50% freespace remaining
I would not run FSX on the OS drive and always install it to its own drive or array
Nick how do you have your system setup? Do you partition your OS drive? |
|
|
Regards,
Gary |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 25 December 2008 at 9:40pm |
|
No I have 5 drives in my primary system and leave the OS drive freespace however from time to time I will partition and use it for a test OS install but when I do I follow the rules above My primary OS is always on the first patition when I do use the available freespace If you wish to use yours as I described for storage, thats fine
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 06 January 2009 at 7:55am |
|
Hi Nick, As a followup, my kind wife gave me two 150GB VelociRaptors for my 3ware card for Christmas. I rebuilt my FSXsp2 rig over the Christmas vacation using the drive-layout list below. I have just one thought with this configuration. Freakin' Screams... I would like to thank you again for you patient-guidance and your professional dedication to the FS Community at large. Drive C: WinXP_x64 -> 150GB WD Raptor -> Asus P5E3 SataII port 0 (AHCI mode) (formated 'primary/active' 4k clusters - default) (write cache enabled) Drive D: FSXsp2 -> (3ware 9650se w/BBU 'PCIe slot1') -> 2x 150GB WD VelociRaptors (256K Raid 0 Stripe) (formated 64k clusters - FSX) Drive E: Archives -> 320GB WD Caviar -> Asus P5E3 Sata port 1 (AHCI mode) (write cache enabled) Notes:
Question: When reformating drives, is it ever necessary to perform a "complete" format of the drives or is 'quick' format adequete; especially when changing cluster sizes? Thanks for your thoughts... With kind regards, |
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 06 January 2009 at 9:30am |
|
The 'quick' format option simply formats the drive and it only takes a few seconds to accomplish. The 'complete' format option includes a full 'scan disk' which is the same as using the CHECK DISK tool in Windows and select "Scan for and Attempt Recovery of Bad Sectors" It performs a sector check and marks any bad sectors into the file table which in turn Windows will never write to that area of the drive. I run a CHKDSK C: /R on all my drives once every 6 months and I do it from a clean boot using the WindowsXP install disk through the recovery console. That command performs the same scan. If I find a drive which Windows reports bad physical sectors I will use the drive manufactures maintenance disk to attempt a true repair. If the drive utility reports damage and suggests replacement then I replace the drive. Typically running the CHKDSK C: /R scan will buy some time so its not a big emergency I usually run the complete format if a drive has been used and I have not run a scan on it in some time. I usually suggest that a new drive be formatted using the the complete method just to be sure there is no defect purchased. Something I dont practice myself and it will probably some day bite me in the arse.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
yiorgo
New Member
Joined: 21 January 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 8 |
![]() Posted: 03 March 2009 at 12:07pm |
|
Hello, I'm wondering if anybody has thoughts on the Areca ARC-1231ML 2GB raid controller. Although its maximum stripe size is only 128k, it has a wopping 2gb of cache memory. Does the bigger cache size make up for the lower stripe size?
Just trying to make an educated buy. Thanks all. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
BradS
Senior Member
Joined: 13 January 2009 Posts: 121 |
![]() Posted: 03 March 2009 at 12:29pm |
|
Hmmm, I don't know much about that specific controller, other than it is pretty pricey for non-server use, and I thought it was being phased out but I could be mistaken.
NewwEgg has a good selection of 3Ware based RAID card in one place for easy perusing...http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=3ware&x=0&y=0 |
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 03 March 2009 at 12:42pm |
|
I think Nick would say that the stripe needs to be 256K minimum or 512 due to the average file size of Flightsim. 128 is too small.
|
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
yiorgo
New Member
Joined: 21 January 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 8 |
![]() Posted: 03 March 2009 at 4:24pm |
|
Thanks for the response all. I understand that the talk of the town is that 256k or higher is the way to go in terms of stripe size. But, for example, the 3ware 9650se-16ml has only 256k or cache memory. If your stripe was 512k, wouldn't you bottleneck? This is why I was thinking with 2GB of cache, you were at an advantage with this card. Could be wrong of course...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
BradS
Senior Member
Joined: 13 January 2009 Posts: 121 |
![]() Posted: 03 March 2009 at 4:39pm |
|
A cache really comes into value when the same file is being requested many times..having it in cache saves the disk reads and therefore is faster. However, if they are not the same, as is often the case in FSX (when flying over landscape), then having a big cache can cause a potential slowdown. The card must first check to see if the file being requested is in cache; if not then it must go to the disk to get it...kinda of a double hit.
|
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 03 March 2009 at 5:00pm |
|
Originally posted by yiorgo
But, for example, the 3ware 9650se-16ml has only 256k or cache memory.
re-read that
thats 256MB not KB of DDR2 533 cache memory
and you do not need the 16ML model.. the 4LPML is fine
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816116042
and you donot need RAID if the new Velociraptor HDD is used with that card
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
yiorgo
New Member
Joined: 21 January 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 8 |
![]() Posted: 04 March 2009 at 8:57am |
|
I stand corrected! Oops, My bad. It is MB and not KB. Big difference :-)
Ok Nick, I see that if I use the new VRap, RAID is not needed. I did read in your FSX optimization thread that you rated 2 VRaps in Raid 0 on the proper controller still beat 1 Vrap on the same controller. Is the difference noteworthy? I'm going to build a new PC with a lot of consideration for FSX. I'm down to the hard drives now. Your posts have been very helpful BTW. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 04 March 2009 at 10:54am |
|
I was only showing the highest to lowest perf potential. I did note in that list that RAID was not needed for FSX if the right hard drive was used |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Psybear
Senior Member
Joined: 02 April 2008 Posts: 154 |
![]() Posted: 04 March 2009 at 1:50pm |
|
Yiorgo,
I followed Nick's advice regarding the 9650SE 4L and have a Vrap for the OS and a separate Vrap for FSX both running off the controller...no RAID and I concur. Probably one of the best engineering builds possible for FSX. Assuming a strong CPU...it's the way to go. And if I haven't already thanked you enough, here's one more - Thanks, Nick! |
|
|
FSX Accel(MTX/STB/FSG/STLC/GEX/UTX/FEX-ASA) Vrap300 | Win7 x64 Vrap150 | SATAII 9650SE 4L
780i/Q9650@3.6GHz|4GB DDR2 @ 1066MHz 5-4-4-10-2T GTX275 @ 648-2376-1458|24W @ 19x12 + 19"|X-Fi Prelude |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
yiorgo
New Member
Joined: 21 January 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 8 |
![]() Posted: 04 March 2009 at 11:15pm |
|
That's it for me, all parts order from Newegg now. I am going for exactly the setup you described Psybear with the new Vraps. Thanks for the insight. It may be a more pricey solution but it seems that you pay for what you get.
As for Nick... Well, I think we should start a Nick appreciation thread :-) Seriously, dude, you've helped so many of us make some informed choices. Props to you! |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 05 March 2009 at 1:10pm |
|
Its about choices... what I posted will take you into years of constant and reliable storage performance. Why wonder where a problem is coming from? Each time you add the right hardware to a system and confirm it you are removing another bottleneck @ Psybear.. the CPU is relieved of the stress by using the suggested hardware. So slower CPUs benefit from it even more than fast ones
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Psybear
Senior Member
Joined: 02 April 2008 Posts: 154 |
![]() Posted: 05 March 2009 at 4:35pm |
|
Understood. What I was intending to get across was that the CPU being most important for FSX; this controller with Velociraptors was probably the best thing we could do to our FSX delivery devices. (FDD)
![]() By the way, since implementing this set up, stutters, freezes and crashes have been virtually eliminated on my FDD. I can now land in Central Park with Manhattan X without jitters. But there are still no milkmaids there either. ![]() Best, Psy |
|
|
FSX Accel(MTX/STB/FSG/STLC/GEX/UTX/FEX-ASA) Vrap300 | Win7 x64 Vrap150 | SATAII 9650SE 4L
780i/Q9650@3.6GHz|4GB DDR2 @ 1066MHz 5-4-4-10-2T GTX275 @ 648-2376-1458|24W @ 19x12 + 19"|X-Fi Prelude |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
mvalotta
Senior Member
Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Tuvalu Posts: 161 |
![]() Posted: 12 April 2009 at 9:12pm |
|
Hi Nick, I was following your recommendations through this forum and others, and I almost understood everything ok. I purchased two vraps and the 3ware is coming. For the OS I have a seagate barracuda 1TB sata II 32mb cache. What I wonder is the following: The single Sata II OS drive, would be better to be installed as a single drive on the card? (on this case, the card should boot the system) or plugging the OS drive directly to the first available on-board sata port would hit pèrfomance or bring some problems under this configuration? (2xvraps Raid0 on 3ware and OS sinlge drive plugged to onbaord stat port) Many thanks for your support. Mario |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Psybear
Senior Member
Joined: 02 April 2008 Posts: 154 |
![]() Posted: 12 April 2009 at 10:12pm |
|
Everything running off the 3ware.
Personally, I use one Vrap for the OS and one Vrap for FSX. The 7200rpm drive is for everything else. If you want to do RAID, its almost overkill. But still connect the 7200rpm to the card if you boot from it. Bottom line....Boot from the card. I think that's what your asking. |
|
|
FSX Accel(MTX/STB/FSG/STLC/GEX/UTX/FEX-ASA) Vrap300 | Win7 x64 Vrap150 | SATAII 9650SE 4L
780i/Q9650@3.6GHz|4GB DDR2 @ 1066MHz 5-4-4-10-2T GTX275 @ 648-2376-1458|24W @ 19x12 + 19"|X-Fi Prelude |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 12 April 2009 at 10:39pm |
|
Raid is overkill with Vraps. you wont see any advantage over a single Vrap using that card with the exception of one circumstance and even then the gain although better, would not be 100% If one purchased the card and did not spend the money on the Vraps but instead purchased 2 32MB cache drives those would be equal in speed in RAID on that card with a single Vrap So you do not need to RAID those Vraps. The only exception I would make to that is if you intend to install very large photoscenery packages which have huge files associated with it.. then I can see some advantage with the RAID on the Vraps.. otherwise its overkill I have a few systems that I use the card strictly for the performance application and use a motherboard SATA port for the OS and it works fine so that is an option, just not as fast. Using the card for all drives and shutting down the SATA system completely is the highest perf option however do keep in mind, to do so means you must have the battery backup unit for the card operational too. External backup units will not protect from data loss in the event of a crash and the BBU module must be used.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
mvalotta
Senior Member
Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Tuvalu Posts: 161 |
![]() Posted: 13 April 2009 at 8:37pm |
|
Yes Psybear, I was asking that, roger and thank you, booting from the card gonna be better. That`s clear Nick: 2 Vraps in raid for 3ware is and overkill, I assumed that after reading your topic, but I have a lot of addons and macro sceneries to install, and wont hurt the perfomance because of that, I need both in term of space. Well, as always, many thanks for your help and clarification. Best regards. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 14 May 2009 at 8:19am |
|
Nick, Should I enable Queing in 3DM2 for single drives on the 9650se that are set to 'fixdisk'? I understand my FSX raid0 set should have it unchecked but what about my single Raptor boot drive (fixdisk) or my single Caviar archive drive (fixdisk)? I checked the drive compatibility doc on the 3ware site and both of these are listed to have 'enable NCQ'. I understand your instruction above to not enable NCQ for the FSX drive/set, but what about other fixedisk drives? 3Ware 9650se-4PL (w/BBU) - Onboard Matrix Raid/AHCI disabled Lane 1 = WD Raptor 150GB fixedisk (WinXP_x64) <-- Enable NCQ? Lane 2&3 = WD VelociRaptor 150GB x2 (Raid0) FSX <-- NCQ is OFF! Lane 4 = WD Caviar 320GB fixdisk (Archive) <-- Enable NCQ? |
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
NickN
Certified Professional
Joined: 21 November 2007 Posts: 5242 |
![]() Posted: 14 May 2009 at 9:09am |
|
NCQ or Queing reduces the performance of any SATA drive The only time NCQ should be enabled is in a multiuser network environment |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
jordanal
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2006 Posts: 102 |
![]() Posted: 14 May 2009 at 9:16am |
|
Originally posted by NickN
NCQ or Queing reduces the performance of any SATA drive The only time NCQ should be enabled is in a multiuser network environment Short and to the point! I doesn't get any easier than that. Thanks for the quick reply as I know you're terribly busy. |
|
|
Al Jordan|KCHS
FSXsp2: i7-920@4.0GHz (XPx64)/Asus P6T-D-v2/Mush DDR3-1600/GTX285/XFi-XtremeGamer/3Ware-9650se WinXPx64 Rap; FSX Raid0-VRap x2) FSX-Client: E8500 (Vista-x64)/Asus P5E3-D/2x2GB |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|